Protections to minority shareholders and their effectiveness in protecting the smaller shareholders

This essay was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies Example Law Essay Critically evaluate protections to minority shareholders and their effectiveness in protecting the smaller shareholders from the unfair dominance of the Majority.   Date authored: 12 th July, 2014   Abstract In order to adequately…

Read More

The jewel in the Crown

‘The jury system is often described as “the jewel in the Crown” or “the corner-stone” of the British criminal justice system. It is a hallowed institution which, because of its ancient origin and involvement of 12 randomly selected lay people in the criminal process, commands much public confidence.’ Lord Justice Auld (1999) Review of the…

Read More

The image of a woman judge

On the issue of whether we should want more women judges I agree with Baroness Hale’s opinion, presented in her paper: ‘Equality and the Judiciary: Why Should We Want More Women Judges?’ that we should want more women judges. I will argue this viewpoint by analysing how women judges can bring about positive changes in…

Read More

The idea of separation of powers

Introduction The idea of Separation of Powers suggests that governance of the State should not fall solely under one organ of the State which could be identified as the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. Aristotle in his Politics submitted this theory but the most famous version was being suggested by Montesquieu in ‘De L’Espirit des Lois’.…

Read More

Separation of powers

Separation of powers is when the state is divided into three different governmental bodies (legislature, executive and judiciary); and all three bodies have separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility. The effect of separation of powers, is removing the amount of power in any groups hands, so in essence it makes it difficult for…

Read More

Legal System Of Jamaica

The judicial system follows British practice, with some local variations. Cases may be brought in the first instance before a lay magistrate (justice of the peace), a magistrate, or a judge in the Supreme Court, according to the seriousness of the offense or the amount of property involved. The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction.…

Read More

Legal Methods Assignment

Professor John Langbein talks about adversarial and non-adversarial systems of justice in ‘Why Adversary Justice fails’. An adversarial system of justice is one in which two parties contest to arrive at a conclusion decided by the judge or jury, based on the arguments presented by the parties, on behalf of their clients. The leading examples…

Read More

Has the law remained true to the neighbour?

over-ruling, criticising and explaining hundreds of decisions extending over a century before arriving at an obvious principle of liability for negligence.” [2] This is how John O’Connor blandly epitomises the precedential decision made in Donoghue v. Stevenson [3] in his article in The Irish Jurist. However tasteless this description may seem I am inclined to believe that this perfectly…

Read More

Harts theory

Part A This essay will outline all the ways in which Hartand Dworkin would reconcile the decision in Chester v Afshar with their theories, simultaneously offering a critique of both the theories. Chester v Afshar in context of Harts theory There is a general consensus on the pre-eminence of Harts positivist theories; built on the…

Read More

The Crown Prosecution Service describes its role as being “to prosecute cases firmly, fairly and effectively… to what extent does it fulfill its role?

effectively… to what extent does it fulfill its role? The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was recommended in the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure’s Report published in 1981, and was created by virtue of section 1 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The role of the CPS is to objectively assess police investigations and to prosecute cases…

Read More

Citizen & state.

Citizen & State. Judicial Review This problem question necessitates a discussion surrounding the area of Administrative Law in particular Judicial Review. In order to properly advise Electrucs4u as to the grounds they may have for challenging the decision made by the SBQAA by way of judicial review, one must first establish what judicial review is,…

Read More

Case law in england and wales

victim” provides a defence to charges under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, at best, is arbitrary and inconsistent and, at worst, displays judicial prejudice. Principled statutory reform is urgently required. The Offences against the Person Act 1861 has been for a long period now, a very much debatable Act of the Criminal Law.…

Read More

Alternative dispute resolution

allows people to resolve their disputes out side of the court in a comprehensive and cooperative way. ADR is an approach that is quick, less stressful, and cheaper than going to court. ADR processes refer to a variety of action that can help parties resolve their disputes. The ADR processes include mediation, arbitration, neutral evaluation,…

Read More

Action based on judicial review

Outline The Fundamental Essentials Of An Action Based On Judicial Review. Introduction Judicial review can also be expressed as a challenge to the public body in ways judgements are reached, as (Taylor, 2008) comments that ‘Judicial review allows the individual to directly challenge at least some of the decision-making powers of the state’. This simply…

Read More