Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
- ARIEL MAHABIRSINGH
- RACHEL CADOGAN
The OECD is the replacement organization to the Organization for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) whose specific purposes was to help the reconstruction of Europe after World War Two. The OECD development was not always smooth one as it has been perceived as “rich man’s club” its members account for approximately three-fifths of the world’s GNI and has faced many calls for its dismantlement (Woodward, Richard 2009). Over the past 50 years, the OECD has become a valuable source of “policy analysis and internationallycomparable statistical, economic and social data.” (USOECD 2014)
Image showing member nations of the OECD
The OECD mission is “to promote policies that will improve sustainable economic growth and development, maximize employment social well-being of people around the world.” (Woodward, 2009)
The Council, which is at the top, consists of ambassadors from the various member states that are in charge of establishing goals and policy issues. The Council holds the power of decision making as they handle the oversight and strategic direction of the organisation.
The Secretariat is made up of the Secretary General, the deputy Secretaries General and directorates. These include economists, scientists and lawyers and several administrative staff, who are responsible for research, data collection and analysis. The Secretary General chairs the Council and thereby manages the work of the Secretariat.
The Committees comprise of representatives from various member countries that come together to form groups such as education, environment, trade and investment.
Table 1 showing: the organizational structure of the OECD
ROLE AND FUNCTION
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has many key roles. These roles include:
The major functions of the OECD are:
- To provide a platform in which governments of member nations can use to find solutions to common problems organize policies and share good practices
- To set global standards and principles by monitoring economic trends.
- and development policies
- To offers the know-how and ideas to over 1000 non-member countries for their development.
(Economy Watch 2010)
HOW THE OECD DOES IT?
The OECD used the wide range of information gathered on various topics to help governments promote “prosperity and fight poverty through economic growth and financial stability. They also ensure the environmental implications of economic and social development are taken into account. OECD’s work is based on continued monitoring of events in member countries as well as outside OECD area, and includes regular projections of short and medium-term economic developments.The OECD Secretariat collects and analyses data, after which committees discuss policy regarding this information, the Council makes decisions, and then governments implement recommendations. ” (OECD 2014)
Table 2 showing: The way the OECD works
Types of Publications
The OECD publications fall into three cqtegories Key Publication, which include Factbooks. At a Glance books, Insights, Outlooks, Economic Surveys, OECD Observer, Better Policies Series, OECD Insights and Blogs. They also produce several other types which include statistics, journals,magazines and papers (OECD 2014)
A couple examples are as followed
- Africn Economic Outlook 2014
- Health at a Glance Asia/Pacific 2012
- Agricultural Policy Monitering and Evaluation 2014
- Financiaal Market Trends
- Competition Law & Policy
- OECD Health Statistics
- OECD Productivity Statistics
- OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics
- Education Indicators in Focus
- Trade Policy Papers
Development Projects of the OECD
1. OVERCOMING SCHOOL FAILURE: POLICIES THAT WORK
“This project is based on the idea that the OECD can provide effective support to countries on how to progress toward fair and inclusive education systems,” It offers data on the policies that are successful in reducing school failure, and supports countries in promoting reform.
This project directly reflects one of the roles OECD—providing the platform where governments can work together to solutions to common problems and share good practices. This project is both comparative and selective. It offers the breakdown of challenges faced by countries as well as an overview of the different policies implemented across OECD countries that aims at equity in education policies. Countries that are interested can have a targeted national assessment seminar during which the precise situation of the country will be examined. (OECD 2010)
The overall aim of this project is to provide assistance and support to countries trying to improving
their education policy and practices, in order to achieve reduction in failure and dropout rates. It updates
and fine-tunes policies giving “tailor-made advice on how to design and model their policies, as well as on
how to overcome barriers to implementation”. (OECD 2010)
Table 3 showing: The structure of the OECD Project Overcoming School Failure: Policies That Work
2. PROGRAMME FOR INTERNATIONAAL STUDENT ASSESSMENT (PISA)
What is PISA?
PISA is the OCED’s answer to the global call for countries to have a way of comparing the effect of their investments in schooling on the students’ knowledge and skills. (Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment. 2011) This is an international assessment that examines educational performances on a common measure that is, reading science across countries, OCED member nations, partner nations and other non-members. (OECD 2014)It addresses the questions of if students are ready for real life future challenges? Are they able to analyze and communicate effectively? Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay and Venezuela have all participated in this project. (OECD 201)
With PISA and other data provided by the OECD together with policy analysis,
helps to build more effective and unbiased educational system with improved
outcomes. As PISA addresses the future questions, the data gathered by this
research helps to shape policy plans by identifying possible future issues. (OECD 2014)
PISA represents a pledge by nations to supervise the outcomes of education
systems through measuring student achievement on a regular basis and within
an internationally agreed common framework. It aims to present a new
foundation for policy dialogue and for partnership in defining and executing
educational goals, in inventive ways that reflect judgments about the skills that are relevant to adult life. (OECD, 2009, p.9)
PISA is one of the OECD major policy tools; this programme has pioneered new and highly collaborative ways in which to measure progress in societies on a global scale. There are many lessons that can be learnt from PISA on how to evaluate learning, the pace of achieving learning goal. Some countries have used their PISA results for a policy discussion indicates the likely pace of progress towards achieving a learning goal.
3. THE BETTER LIFE INITIATIVE
This project is a combination of various OCED works that makes an effort for move beyond GDP as a measure the well being of society, the OCED has pioneered a field of research that focuses on the aspects of life that matter to people and shapes their quality of life. They have identified 11 dimensions as being essential in terms of ‘material living conditions” which are income, housing and jobs and “quality of life “education, community, local environment, governance, health, subjective life satisfaction work/life balance and personal safety.(OECD 2011) This initiative is measured by the better life index
Table 4 showing: The features of measuring well being
“The Better Life Indexes an interactive tool that allows you to see how countries perform according to the importance you give to each of 11 topics that make for a better life. From a statistical point of view, the Index relies on best practices for building composite indicators. The Index is robust to various methodological assumptions.”
4. LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN-OECD INVESTMENT INITIATIVE
This Initiative aims to increase the input of private investment to economic and social development.
It help improves government policies at three levels: (OECD 2010)
Table 5 showing: How the initiative improves government policies
Success and Failure of Initiatives
The Better Life Initiative has been by itself a success, considering that it is a newly introduced program. Out of this came the “Better Life Index” and “How’s Life”. The Better Life Index which was launched in 2011 is an interactive tool that allows one to assess the performance of countries based on eleven key elements that are important in the development and well being of OECD countries. It has been created in order to involve and engage citizens as they too play a role in the decision making of policies that lead the way to their social well being. The eleven dimensions include: Housing, Income, Jobs, Community, Education, Environment, Governance, Health, Life Satisfaction, Safety and Work Life Balance.
. Each flower represents one country
. Each petal represents one of the eleven dimensions
. The length of the petal represents the country’s score in a topic and the width represents the importance of the
Table 6 showing: How the better life index works
PISA– Program for International Student Assessment is an international evaluation that measures fifteen year old students’ performance in areas such as reading, mathematics and science literacy. It was first administered in 2000 and this is when Finland’s education system became involved.
Finland has been the world leader in education however; recent assessments have shown that they are no longer at the top as results have declined since the mid 2000’s. PISA has driven the improvement in the beginning, however recent trends have changed. The involvement of PISA has therefore become a question in the education system. Some argue that it has encouraged the altering of teaching styles, curricula and grading schemes to make students well adapted to the program.
It is established that while PISA has developed the Finnish education system in the early 2000’s it has also done some harm and produced minor downfalls. It has been proven to be an expensive way of handling the students who are “left behind”. These students sometimes become school drop outs or prolong their period of stay in order to successfully complete school. This therefore incurs additional costs on the governments.
A second major issue is the gender differences in various areas of study. An example of this is in mathematics where girls are less motivated to learn and perform. This also ties in with the fact that girls are underrepresented in certain career fields such as engineering and computer science. This then widens the gap in education and so places more emphasis on one side, rather than an equal and fair system.(Strauss, 2013)
Table 7 showing: PISA results
Perception and Responses to the Institution
The OECD is seen as an organization with a bright future because it is forward thinking, one of the best in analysis and policy advice. It is seen as an essential international organization that provides a place for interstate consensus and cooperation bringing nations with similar challenges of globalization and sustainable development together. (Julin 2003) The OECD is perceived as being useful with their data since in some instances has improved policies and strategies when used to implement internal measures, (Asia Society. 2014)
Mr. Paul Krugman is of the view that the OECD in the wake of soaring unemployment rates and low inflation “have consistently called for policies that would depress advanced economies even more.” He believes the OECD often makes recommendations without a rigid application of conventional economic models. (Krugman 2013)
Some believe other institutions such as the World Bank and the World Economic Forum have become competitors the OECD and are actually outperforming them in issues that were once considered OECD turf. They believed that the OECD is outperformed due to the way in which they operate -extremely slow- making the organization seem powerless to pushing burning problems to the top of their agenda. Because of this, there is the perception that the OECD is not a key player in dealing with the issues of globalization and sustainable development. (Julin 2003)
CIVIL SOCIETY AND NGO’S PERCEPTION
The OECD has been engaging with civil society since its inception. For many years the civil societies, especially those whose focus is on business and labour sectors through the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) and the Trade Union Advisory Committee (TUAC) has had a positive response to the OECD since the OECD has increasingly engaged in formal dialogues with them. (Global Policy Forum 2003)
On the other hand, some civil organizations a NGO’S view the OECD as “a servant of developed country interests, sometimes even as an adversary, rather than a partner, in globalization and sustainable development” Civil societies especially criticize the OECD for their lack of openness to membership to nations other than European and a few rich non-European nations (Julin 2003) especially since the dialogue with these other interests are usually informal..
Asia Society. 2014. “What is PISA and Why Does it Matter?”Accessed September 22, 2014.
Economy Watch. 2010. “Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.” Accessed September 15, 2014.
Friends of the Chair group on broader measures of progress. 2014. Some national, regional and international efforts and
practices in the measurement of sustainable development and human well-being.” Friends of the Chair group on broader measures of progress.
Global Policy Forum 2003. “NGOs and the OECD”. Accessed September 22, 2014
Julin, Jorma. 2003. “The OECD: Securing the future” OECD Observer, December. Accessed September 22, 2014
Krugman, Paul. 2013. “Uncertain at the OECD.” The New York Times. September 12, Accessed September 22, 2014
OECD 2010, “Active with Latin America and Caribbean”. Accessed September 28, 2014.
OECD 2010, ”Latin America and Caribbean: Conference on investment for jobs and development, Santiago, Chile, 27-28
September 2010” Accessed September 28, 2014 http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/latinamericaandcaribbeanconferenceoninvestmentforjobsanddevelopmentsantiagochile27-28september2010.htm
OECD 2011. How’s Life? Measuring well-being, OECD Publishing Accessed September 18,
OECD 2011. “Latin America and Caribbean: Conference on investing in infrastructure for jobs and development” Accessed
OECD. 2011. “OECD Launches Your Better Life Index.” Accessed September 20, 2014.
OECD 2012. “Latin America and Caribbean: Conference on international value chains” Accessed September 28, 2014.
OECD. 2014. “About PISA” Accessed September 19, 2014. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisafaq.htm
OECD. 2014. “History.”Accessed September 15, 2014 http://www.oecd.org/about/history/.
OECD. 2014. “Members and Partners”. Accessed September 18, 2014 http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/
OECD. 2014.”Latin America and Caribbean: Conference on infrastructure investment” Accessed September 28,, 2014.
OECD. “OECDiLibrary.” Accessed September 17, 2014.
OECD. 2014. “Who Does What?” Accessed September 20 2014http://www.oecd.org/about/whodoeswhat/
OECD. 2014. “OECD Publishing” http://www.oecd.org/about/publishing/
OECD ILIBRARY. 2014 Accessed September 20, 2014. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/#
Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment. 2011. “POLICY EFFECTS OF PISA” Accessed September 18 2014
OECD/AfDB/UNDP(2014),African Economic Outlook 2014: Global Value Chains and Africa’s Industrialisation, OECD
Publishing. Accessed September 21, 2014. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/african-economic-outlook_19991029
Strauss, Valerie. 2013. “Are Finland’s vaunted schools slipping?” The Washington Post , December 3. Accessed September
United States OECD. 2014. “What is the OECD?” Accessed September 22, 2014.
Woodward, Richard. 2009. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)Global Institutions, Taylor & Francis. Accessed September 15, 201 4